Truth in Advertising?
One thing about gardening as a hobby
is its peaceful and therapeutic nature. Life itself, including our jobs, and
even many other hobbies can be controversial and stressful. We gardeners do
have to adjust to some challenges during the growing season, though. Dealing
with mother nature as she shows herself in the unpredictability of weather
comes to mind. Then there is the annual onslaught of bugs, critters and
diseases. But, there is also the sense that gardening is an ethical hobby, in
which there is nothing to be gained from misrepresentation and dishonesty. What
you put into the ground in the spring will be matched later on by what you
harvest, with no unpleasant surprises.
Alas, gardening does occasionally
fall victim to those who are more concerned with profit than with truth. As a
person who treats gardening with respect, and expects those involved to
maintain high standards, this is the one area that has been bugging me lately.
It really was not very noticeable in times past, when seed catalogs were mostly
concerned with peddling the latest and greatest hybrid tomato. But, an
interesting trend toward heirlooms has emerged recently, which is great news
for all adventurous gardeners. Due to the success of the Seed Savers Exchange
in attracting attention to the superiority of many heirloom varieties of all
vegetable and fruit crops, it was only a matter of time until seed companies
decided that they were missing the boat on potential profits.
I get a lot of seed catalogs in the mail each
spring, but not nearly as many as I used to. That is because of the realization
that there is very little, if anything, that they now carry that I either do
not have, or cannot easily acquire from gardening friends, many of whom are also
active members of the SSE. Also, Carolyn, myself and many others have been
providing some smaller seed companies with samples of what we feel are the best
of what we have grown. This has led to wider exposure and availability through
inclusion into various seed catalogs. But, I still get enough catalogs to be
able to show you how much more accessible heirlooms now are. For example, two
of the major
So, why am I complaining, and what
is the major reason for this article? I am thrilled to see the heirloom
tomatoes widely available to the gardening public at long last. Now thousands
of gardeners who have not opted to join and participate in the SSE for one
reason or another can find out what we have known for a long time. There is so
much to experience beyond Big Boy and Roma. Seeds from heirlooms can be saved
and passed on to others. Finally, there is now a much better chance that these
varieties will not become lost or forgotten. But, what about the information
that is showing up in the seed catalogs? Is it accurate, or has it been
distorted to attract sales? And even more troublesome, have the companies that
are now offering these varieties ever even seen them growing, or tasted them?
Why do many of the descriptions read the same, catalog to catalog? I feel that
there is no need to attach an over the top description to heirlooms. The fact
that they have been maintained for their excellence speaks for itself. And, the
history of a variety should be carefully recorded, just as the genealogy of a
family is maintained accurately.
It is disturbing to me to see how
much misinformation is indeed being perpetuated in the seed business. Truth in
advertising? There is no guarantee of that. I can deal with too much rain, or
very dry periods, or the bugs. I can even forgive the deer that have recently
become so fond of nearly everything green in my garden. What is offensive to me
is the lack of respect that some have for their customers. There are simply too
many mistakes in seed catalogs in the area of heirloom vegetables.
Some examples will be given to
illustrate my points. I want to start with the tomato that has become one of
the biggest mysteries so far. Abraham
Lincoln was bred by the Buckbee Seed Company, and was first released to the
gardening public in 1923. The original description from the 1923 seed catalog
states that it is a large tomato, over a pound each, on a large plant. The
drawing of the plant on the cover of the catalog shows a plant that has bronzy
tinged green foliage. I have obtained this tomato from numerous sources,
including numerous seed companies and home gardeners. Each time I grew short 4
foot tall green plants bearing medium sized red tomatoes. No one seems to have
the real thing, yet seed company after seed company maintain the original
description.
There are numerous examples of the
colors of heirloom tomatoes being incorrectly given. Many pink tomatoes are
listed as red, especially Dinner Plate,
Wanda’s Potato Top, Jefferson Davis, and Brandywine (though there is a Red Brandywine, and it is nothing like
the pink version). This probably seems like a minor point. I think it is a
major issue, however. One problem with growing heirloom tomatoes and saving
seeds is knowing if you have crossing. Color and leaf shape are important
factors in identifying whether you have the real thing or not. Another
observation is that many seed companies offer descriptions that are exactly the
same as those that appeared in the old Gleckler catalogs. Or, as I said
previously, some descriptions seem to be identical, company to company. You
would think that it would be wise for these companies to grow the tomatoes out
and see for themselves, and write their catalog descriptions from their
observations. A lot of the descriptions also seem to come from the SSE Yearbook
listings, which is even more risky, since a lot of crossing and inaccurate
recording of information occurs in the SSE growers networks. One catalog gives
lots of incorrect growth characteristics of the plants. An example is listing
vigorous indeterminate varieties as growing 18 to 24 inches tall (feet,
maybe!), or small 4-6 ounce fruit being 3 to 4 inches in diameter. Another
catalog lists a series of Russian tomatoes with accompanying descriptions that
are way over the top compared to their performance in the garden. There are
also such problems as listing German
Johnson, a well known North Carolina heirloom and one of the original
parents of Mortgage Lifter, as a
potato leaf variety, when it is really a regular leaf plant. It makes you
wonder if the seed companies know what they are selling to the public, or even
care.
The thing that gives me the most
trouble, though, is when twisted history ends up in the catalog description.
There are examples of calling such varieties as Green Grape, Green Zebra,
Banana Legs, or Snow White Cherry heirloom varieties (they were actually the result
of growouts from hybrid crosses made in the 1970’s and 1980’s). More disturbing
is giving a tomato a completely new history! My favorite example is Cherokee Purple. I was sent this tomato
in the late 1980’s by J. D. Green of Servierville, Tennessee. He told me that
he received the tomato from his neighbors, whose ancestors received the strain
from local Cherokee Indians there. A major seed catalog now lists the history
as ”originally given by native Americans to early Appalachian settlers, making
its way from Pennsylvania to Georgia”! Some catalogs list Mortgage Lifter as being an Amish heirloom from the 1800’s, when in
truth it was developed in West Virginia in the mid 1920’s. There is a full
history of this remarkable tomato in the Southern Exposure Seed Exchange
catalog. Then there is Mr. Stripey,
which is showing up in lots of catalogs over the past 2 years as a large
bicolor heirloom. In reality, Mr.
Stripey is a synonym for an older English developed variety called Tigerella, which is a small red tomato
with jagged gold stripes.
So, what is an avid heirloom
gardener to do? My advice is to deal with seed companies that have a track
record for treating heirloom tomatoes and their history with accuracy and
respect. Such companies as Johnny’s Selected Seeds, Tomato Grower’s Supply
Company, and Southern Exposure Seed
Exchange fit this bill, and are making a significant impact in bringing these
wonderful living treasures into people’s gardens all over the country.